loader image

The dilemma: restore completely or maintain the original patina?

Advertising

If there's one thing I've learned in my years as a classic car collector, it's that every car tells a story. And sometimes, that story is written on the body itself: in the wear, the marks of time, the sun-faded paint. That's where one of the biggest dilemmas any classic car lover faces comes in: Complete restoration or maintenance of the original patina?

I've been through this more times than I'd like to admit. Some say a full restoration is the only way to restore a classic to its former glory. Others claim that the original patina gives it soul and authenticity. And I've learned over time that there's no right answer. It depends on the car, its history, and, above all, what you're looking for as a collector.

Advertising

The case for full restoration

Completely restoring a classic is a transformative experience. There's nothing like seeing a car that was on the brink of oblivion reborn with pristine paint, gleaming chrome, and a brand-new interior. Plus, if you're looking for resale value, a well-done restoration can fetch astronomical prices at auction.

I remember restoring my first '67 Mustang Fastback. It was a long and expensive process, but when I saw it finished, I felt like I had come back to life. Everything worked like it came straight from the factory, and the feeling of driving it was simply indescribable.

+You will be interested: My process for recovering the original paint of a classic

The charm of the original patina

On the other hand, there are cars that bear their history in every imperfection. And there's something magical about that. Preserving the original patina is maintaining the authenticity of a classic. It's like seeing the scars of a warrior who has lived through battles, and that has incalculable sentimental value.

I have a '55 Chevy Bel Air with worn original paint and some surface rust. At first, I thought about restoring it, but every time I looked at it, I realized it was perfect this way. That patina told its story better than any restoration could.

So what is the best option: fully restore or maintain the original patina?

The decision depends on several factors: the car's condition, its rarity, its history, and what you want to achieve with it. If it's in extremely deteriorated condition, a restoration may be the only way to save it. But if it retains its essence and wear and tear is part of its charm, perhaps maintaining the original patina is the best option.

Nowadays, there's a growing trend called "preservation," which seeks to maintain a car's originality without altering its history, making only the necessary changes to keep it functional and safe. This strikes me as an interesting compromise between the two.

Ultimately, there's no universal rule. Every car is unique, and every collector has their own vision. At the end of the day, the important thing is that when you look at your classic, you feel like you made the best decision for it. And, above all, that you enjoy every mile behind the wheel.

And you prefer fully restore or maintain the original patina?